Blackburn News - Your Local News Network


ICE Futures Canada prices lower

WINNIPEG – ICE Futures Canada closing prices:Canola: Nov ’15 $9.80 lower $460.60; Jan. ’16 $9.80 lower $468.00; March ’16 $8.70 lower $474.20; May ’16 $7.80 lower $477.20; July ’16 $6.50 lower $479.80; Nov. ’16 $5.90 lower $470.40; Jan. ’17 $5.90 lower…

Minister says farmland sale not a money grab

REGINA – Saskatchewan Agriculture Minister Lyle Stewart says an offer to sell leased farmland to producers is not a money grab.Stewart says the Saskatchewan Party campaigned on selling occupied agricultural Crown land in 2007, because the party believe…

ICE Futures Canada prices lower

WINNIPEG – ICE Futures Canada closing prices:Canola: Nov ’15 $1.90 lower $470.40; Jan. ’16 $1.90 lower $477.80; March ’16 $2.60 lower $482.90; May ’16 $2.50 lower $485.00; July ’16 $2.00 lower $486.30; Nov. ’16 $2.50 lower $476.30; Jan. ’17 $2.50 lower…

Family wants talks on contaminated farm

An Alberta family whose farmland has been tainted by chemical contamination has asked the province’s energy regulator to force the responsible companies to negotiate compensation.

“These are very solid facts upon which the regulator can demonstrate it does have the ability to be an enforcer when things go wrong,” said Keith Wilson, lawyer for Ron and Lonni Saken.

The Sakens were informed in 2014 that groundwater under their dairy farm — which has been in the family since 1929 — was contaminated by a solvent used in the treatment of sour gas.

That solvent comes from a gas plant owned by Bonavista Energy, which bought the plant from Suncor (TSX:SU) in 2010. Bonavista’s studies show the leaching began years before it bought the plant.

Experts say it will be at least a decade before the groundwater is safe and will more likely take 30 years or longer. Meanwhile, the contamination prevents the Sakens from selling their farm or borrowing against it.

Plans to expand the farm to allow their son and his fiancee to join it have been put on hold.

The Alberta Energy Regulator has ordered Bonavista to truck at least 9.5 million litres a year to the farm for the family, staff and cattle. Bonavista has complied.

But the water is only a stop-gap, said Wilson. He points to provisions in the 2013 law that created the agency, allowing it to direct companies to attend a dispute resolution meeting.

His letter to the regulator asks it to force both Bonavista and Suncor to do so.

“The meeting will provide an opportunity for the two energy companies known to be responsible for the contamination of the Saken farm to develop a long-term solution,” he wrote.

In a letter to the regulator, Bonavista says it is willing to attend such a meeting but is wary of the stakes. It argues the rules say those talks could only involve the order to supply water.

“Bonavista understands Mr. Wilson’s request to relate to more than the order,” says the company’s letter.

It said it would negotiate with the Sakens if the scope was agreed on in advance.

In earlier correspondence with The Canadian Press, Suncor has said it’s “not appropriate” to comment on a plant it no longer owns.

Nigel Bankes, a resource law professor at the University of Calgary, said Wilson might get the regulator to force Bonavista to the table, but is unlikely to get Suncor.

He said both companies could be included in a contaminated sites order using provincial legislation.

“Then there is a possibility of implicating other persons responsible, (which) would include a prior owner of the facility,” Bankes said.

“I’m not sure why that wouldn’t have been done yet. There doesn’t seem to be much doubt there is contamination.”

A spokesman for the Alberta Energy Regulator was not immediately available.

Firefighters train with grain entrapment gear

PRINCE ALBERT, Alta. – Firefighters in northern Saskatchewan spent the weekend practising how to use their new equipment for rescuing people who get trapped in grain.The Prince Albert fire department’s grain entrapment rescue device uses metal plates, …

ICE Futures Canada prices higher

WINNIPEG – ICE Futures Canada closing prices:Canola: Nov ’15 $4.60 higher $472.30; Jan. ’16 $5.20 higher $479.70; March ’16 $5.70 higher $485.50; May ’16 $5.60 higher $487.50; July ’16 $6.20 higher $488.30; Nov. ’16 $5.90 higher $478.80; Jan. ’17 $5.90…

TPP raises more questions about dairy impact

MONTREAL – Canada’s dairy industry could face a bigger hit from the Trans-Pacific Partnership than previously thought, says an agricultural expert who studied the text of the deal involving 12 countries.In addition to affecting milk, the TPP agreement …

The TPP text: Winners, losers, highlights

WASHINGTON – After years of secret negotiations, the text of the Trans-Pacific Partnership was finally released Thursday. The agreement covers 12 countries and is billed as the largest trade zone in history.

Its contents will be pored over for weeks and months — given the thousands of pages of the agreement, its series of side-arrangements and annexes, and all the industries and people it affects.

But here are some initial highlights:

—Entry into force: The agreement must be ratified by all 12 countries, and then it takes effect six months later. In Canada, this requires a parliamentary vote. Alternatively, it can also take effect if it’s ratified by half the countries representing 85 per cent of the zone’s economy. A country can withdraw any time, on six months’ notice. Canada’s new Liberal government hasn’t taken a position yet, and the debate will begin in multiple parliaments over the coming months.

—Enforcement tribunals: Like past trade deals, this one will be enforced by special tribunals that operate outside national legal systems. Opponents call this undemocratic. Proponents call it a fair means of arbitrating disputes. Here’s how it works. If a company feels its rights have been infringed by a government policy, it can sue. The case is heard by a three-member panel. Each side chooses one member and they pick a chair, together. The tribunals can’t explicitly overrule government policies, but they can impose fines — and can use the threat of fines to urge governments to change a policy.

—Canadian winners: Hundreds of companies across a multitude of sectors will benefit from reduced tariffs, especially in Japan. For example, the current 39-per-cent tariff on cattle exports will be mostly eliminated — and these kinds of provisions exist across many sectors ranging from agriculture to high tech. Consumers will see lower prices on different products.

—Canadian losers: More foreign dairy will be allowed into the country, causing a market-share loss of at least three per cent for Canadian producers of some dairy products. There’s also fear of job-losses in the auto sector. Some pockets of the auto sector will face greater competition from lower-cost producers in Asia. The previous Conservative government promised compensation packages for those industries.

—Pharma: Some poorer countries could see new financial barriers to cutting-edge medicines. Next-generation, hyper-expensive biologics drugs can cost thousands per dose. They’ll be spared from cheaper, generic-like competition for anywhere from five to eight years. This doesn’t really affect Canada, as it already has an eight-year protection. But some poorer countries had no exclusivity at all — and this rule represents a big change for them. American industry isn’t happy, however, because it wanted 12 years’ exclusivity — and it remains to be seen whether it will spend money to lobby against the deal in U.S. Congress.

—Copyright: Don’t expect free downloads of Elvis Presley songs before 2047, or the right to publish transcripts of Martin Luther King’s, “I Have A Dream Speech,” before 2038. They’re both copyrighted, and will continue to be so for quite a while under this deal. Copyright protections will exist for 70 years after an author’s death. That’s already U.S. policy. But it’s 20 years longer than the status quo in Canada. So this means the works of author Mordecai Richler, for instance, are protected for an additional generation — instead of being available in 2051, they won’t be in the public domain until 2071. On the other hand, Internet-piracy provisions are not as strict as some expected. They do set out financial penalties for ISPs that fail to deliver notices of infringement to customers.

—Environmental and labour standards: When he first ran for president, Barack Obama promised a new deal that would create new standards for the environment and workers. This agreement does include provisions for both. One example is that disputes involving workers’ rights or the environment should have at least one arbitrator specializing in those areas.

—State-owned enterprises: There were lots of fears expressed over social media in recent months that the deal could kill Crown corporations like the CBC, Canada Post and Telefilm. The deal does set rules for state-owned enterprises, with guidelines against anti-competitive behaviour and transparency provisions that force financial disclosures. But it’s loaded with exceptions. It clearly says state-run enterprises and monopolies are allowed. A big exemption touches public procurement. There’s even a specific exemption mentioning for several Canadian institutions like the CBC, Telefilm, and the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. There is no specific mention of Canada Post. Some opponents have expressed fear about the impact on mail delivery. However, the previous Harper government said the deal would exempt public services.

ICE Futures Canada prices mixed

WINNIPEG – ICE Futures Canada closing prices:Canola: Nov ’15 $6.70 lower $467.70; Jan. ’16 $6.90 lower $474.50; March ’16 $6.40 lower $479.80; May ’16 $6.30 lower $481.90; July ’16 $5.80 lower $482.10; Nov. ’16 $5.60 lower $472.90; Jan. ’17 $5.60 lower…